I think I found the place that defines whether a spell is considered a hostile action or not Code: .text:100769F0 ; int __cdecl Spell__Is_Spell_Harmful_To_Target(_SpellIdx, ObjHndl, ObjHndl) .text:100769F0 Spell__Is_Spell_Harmful_To_Target proc near ; CODE XREF: sub_10057DC0+21p .text:100769F0 ; sub_1008AD10+115p ... .text:100769F0 .text:100769F0 nSpellIdx = dword ptr 8 .text:100769F0 ObjHnd_Caster = ObjHndl ptr 0Ch .text:100769F0 ObjHnd_Target = ObjHndl ptr 14h There's a hard coded table there (10076E18) for 729 spells, where it seems it is defined whether the spell is: 0 always benign, 1 always harmful, 2 harmful to undead only 3 benign to undead only 4 benign to friendly npcs only The mass cure spells are set to type 4 so it would seem that's the cause of the problem (whereas the normal cure spells are type 2). Friendly NPCs btw is pretty much party members, "stranger" NPCs aren't considered "friendly" for that purpose. Mainly making a mental note so I can test it later, but if someone wants to participate in testing / say something go ahead.
But were people using Mass Cure spells on Berla? That seems unlikely... is that the sort of bug you are thinking of?
Alright, I can confirm the bug and the fix: casting the Cure X Wounds, Mass spells on non-party NPCs is currently considered a hostile action and will initiate combat. Fix: Changing the following bytes in the DLL to 02 fixes the issue Cure Light Wounds, Mass - Offset 0x76EF4 Mass Heal - Offset 0x76F42 Cure Moderate Wounds, Mass - Offset 0x77058 Cure Serious Wounds, Mass - Offset 0x77059 Cure Critical Wounds, Mass - Offset 0x7705A That's Atari buglist # 294, can finally be crossed off :yes:
